News Feed

Fable 5 lasted three days before getting pulled. Not because it was bad, the suspension had nothing to do with the model’s actual quality. Got me thinking about how most “model risk” planning is just “what if the output gets worse” or “what if the API goes down.” Those are testable. What’s apparently not testable is “what if access to this exact model just stops existing for reasons completely unrelated to how good it is.” Anyone actually built real fallback paths for this, like a different provider entirely, not just a cheaper model from the same one? Or is everyone just assuming the model they built on will still be there next month? Article that goes deeper on this in comments. submitted by /u/Old_Cap4710 [link] [comments]

TL;DR: Last Friday the US government ordered Anthropic to block all “foreign nationals” — including non-citizens inside the US — from using its new Fable 5 and Mythos 5 models. Since you can’t separate a green-card holder in California from a citizen in real time, Anthropic shut the models down for everyone. It’s the first time export controls have hit an AI model itself rather than the chips that run it. The under-discussed part: a nationality-based access rule that geography can’t enforce pushes companies toward building identity infrastructure — and your AI chats already have zero legal privilege. Even if this order gets reversed, the precedent is the story. What actually happened On June 12, the Commerce Department issued a national-security export-control directive ordering Anthropic ...