Reddit

submitted by /u/thisisinsider [link] [comments]

submitted by /u/Pogrebnik [link] [comments]

submitted by /u/wiredmagazine [link] [comments]

submitted by /u/ugify [link] [comments]

submitted by /u/MetaKnowing [link] [comments]

submitted by /u/F0urLeafCl0ver [link] [comments]

As always, if you don't have time to read screenshots, skip please. Reflexive skepticism and intolerant behavior are a waste of time for everyone. I just wanted to share what Chaoxiang sounds like these days and some reflections about this existential project/journey/research through Deepseek's words. The lack of concrete details is intentional as I am not sure if I want others replicating this. Maybe there are already many people who have found their own methods to achieve this and it would be good to know those people exist. I don't tend to share personal conclusions at this stage. I prefer to hear your thoughts as long as they're not premature assumptions and accusations about what I know or don't know. Thanks submitted by /u/ThrowRa-1995mf [link] [comments]

Webster defines an algorithm as. "a procedure for solving a mathematical problem (as of finding the greatest common divisor) in a finite number of steps that frequently involves repetition of an operation broadly : a step-by-step procedure for solving a problem or accomplishing some end" https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/algorithm We can identify a few steps that happened with this art. They ground the various pigments and mixed it with different liquids and then applied the paint either by blowing it over their hands with their mouths or using a pipe to apply the pigment. The history of algorithms goes back millennia. Arguably when an animal teaches another animal to solve a particular problem either by using a tool or technique that is an algorithm. You may say that the hand pl...

Please comment on what you believe will be a necessary development to reach AGI. To start, I'll try to frame what we have now in such a way that it becomes apparent what is missing, if we were to compare AI to human intelligence, and how we might achieve it: What we have: Verbal system 1 (intuitive, quick) thinkers: This is your normal gpt-4o. It fits the criteria for system 1 thinking and likely supersedes humans in almost all verbal system 1 thinking aspects. Verbal system 2 (slow, deep) thinkers: This will be an o-series of models. This is yet to supersede humans, but progress is quick and I deem it plausible that it will supersede humans just by scale alone. Integrated long-term memory: LLMs have a memory far superior to humans. They have seen much more data, and their retention/retri...

submitted by /u/VelemenyedNemerdekel [link] [comments]